Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-11-26 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 has an overall score of 94.8, which is a lot better than Honor View30 Pro's 74.6 overall score. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 has a more recent 13 version while Honor View30 Pro has Android 10 version. Even when the Samsung Galaxy S20 and the Honor View30 Pro were only released with a couple months difference, the Samsung Galaxy S20 is notably lighter and somewhat thinner.
Samsung Galaxy S20 features a little more vivid display than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution. Galaxy S20 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Honor View30 Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S20 also has more RAM memory.
The Honor View30 Pro captures a little bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S20, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor taking less light and duller colors, and they both have the same video definition, the Honor View30 Pro also counts with better 30 fps video frame rate, a bigger aperture to take better low-light captures and video and a camera with a lot higher 40 mega-pixels resolution.
Galaxy S20 counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Honor View30 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy S20 also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The Honor View30 Pro counts with a little better battery life than Galaxy S20, because it has a 2 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.