Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-11-26 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than the Honor View30 Pro, with a 98 score against 74.6. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body has the same thickness than the Honor View30 Pro, but it is a bit heavier. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a newer 13 version and Honor View30 Pro has Android 10.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little better processing power than Honor View30 Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little more vivid screen than Honor View30 Pro, because it has a better count of pixels per inch of screen, a better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a quite bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures much better photographs and videos than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have a same size back-facing camera sensor, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a camera in the back with lot more MP and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Honor View30 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has improved battery performance than Honor View30 Pro, because it has a 22% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.