Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-11-26 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 is much better than the Honor View30 Pro, getting a 93.4 score against 74.6. Samsung Galaxy S22's design is incredibly newer, somewhat thinner and lighter than the Honor View30 Pro. Both phones we are comparing use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 has the newer 13 version and Honor View30 Pro has Android 10 version.
The Honor View30 Pro features a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S22. Both of them have 8 GB of RAM memory and 8 processing cores. The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a way better looking display than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little worse 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a just a little higher amount of pixels in each inch in the screen.
Honor View30 Pro and Galaxy S22 count with really similar memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S22 has a bit better camera than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low light captures and videos, it also counts with a much larger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality, a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution and a better resolution back camera.
Honor View30 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy S22, because it has an 11% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.