Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-11-26 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the Honor View30 Pro, getting a general score of 95.4 against 74.6. Galaxy S22 Ultra is a heavier cellphone than the Honor View30 Pro, but both are equally thin. Both phones we compare here include Android operating system, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version while Honor View30 Pro has Android 10 version, providing the user some additional features.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much more vibrant screen than Honor View30 Pro, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a quite larger display and a greater display density. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's storage capacity for games and applications is very similar to the Honor View30 Pro one, both have exactly the same internal memory capacity.
Honor View30 Pro has a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra. They have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with improved battery performance than Honor View30 Pro, because it has a 22 percent more battery size. The Galaxy S22 Ultra captures much clearer videos and photos than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a back camera with much more megapixels, a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.