Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2019-11-26 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 has a global score of 83.3, which is much better than Honor View30 Pro's general score of 74.6. Although the Galaxy S9 is older than Honor View30 Pro, it's construction is a little thinner and way lighter. The Honor View30 Pro has a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy S9, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Honor View30 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S9 has a slightly better looking screen than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960 resolution and a greater screen pixels density. Galaxy S9 counts with a quite bigger memory to install applications and games than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 400 GB.
The Honor View30 Pro captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low-light images and videos and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Honor View30 Pro also counts with a back camera with a way higher resolution and a way larger sensor shooting much higher quality videos and pictures.
The Honor View30 Pro has a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has 4100mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.