Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-11-26 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 399 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has an overall score of 80.1, which is a bit better than Honor View30 Pro's global score of 74.6. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro design is heavier and thicker than the Honor View30 Pro. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has 8.0 Oreo version and Honor View30 Pro has Android 10, so it provides some extra features.
Honor View30 Pro has a little faster CPU than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor View30 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit sharper display than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better count of pixels per inch of screen.
The Honor View30 Pro features a way better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting photos and video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor taking lot higher quality pictures and videos, a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a much better (4K) video definition.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little better battery performance than Honor View30 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.