Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-11-26 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro has a global score of 81, which is a bit better than the Honor View30 Pro's score of 74.6. Although it's the best cellphone in our current comparison, it must be told that it is also a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Galaxy XCover Pro has a newer 11 version while Honor View30 Pro has Android 10 version, so it provides the user lots of additional features and optimized performance.
The Honor View30 Pro has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor View30 Pro also has more RAM. Honor View30 Pro and Galaxy XCover Pro count with incredibly similar screens, because although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little better pixel density.
Galaxy XCover Pro has more memory to store more apps and games than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy XCover Pro and Honor View30 Pro feature really similar batteries duration, although the Galaxy XCover Pro has 4050mAh of battery capacity instead of 4100mAh.
Honor View30 Pro features a better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a bigger camera aperture, a lot bigger sensor providing a much better image quality and a way more megapixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.