Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-11-26 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is much better than Honor View30 Pro's score of 74.6. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lighter and somewhat thinner phone than the Honor View30 Pro, even when they were released only a few months apart. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a newer 11 version and Honor View30 Pro has Android 10, providing the user some extra features.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little more vivid display than Honor View30 Pro, because it has a little bit bigger display, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 and a little bit better display density. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Honor View30 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little faster processing unit than Honor View30 Pro. They have 8 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU. Honor View30 Pro has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Honor View30 Pro also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a much better image and video quality, a way more mega-pixels camera in the back and a larger diafragm aperture.
The Honor View30 Pro counts with improved battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4100mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.