Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2019-11-26 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is way better than Honor View30 Pro, getting a overall score of 90.6 against 74.6. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is heavier than the Honor View30 Pro, it's extremely thinner and newer. These phones include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a more recent 11 version while Honor View30 Pro has Android 10 version, providing the user a lot of extra features and some performance improvements.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a little faster processing unit than Honor View30 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Honor View30 Pro features just a bit better looking display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
Honor View30 Pro has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a back camera with a much better resolution and a much larger camera aperture. Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than Honor View30 Pro, because it has more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features just a little bit longer battery performance than Honor View30 Pro, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity against 4100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.