Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2019-11-26 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is a little bit better than the Honor View30 Pro, getting a general score of 81.6 against 74.6. Both devices we are comparing work with the same Android 10 operating system. Although Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is newer than the Honor View30 Pro, it is just a little thicker and just a bit heavier.
The Honor View30 Pro counts with just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Honor View30 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with a bit better looking display than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a quite lower screen density, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a quite bigger display.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for shooting images or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a way better resolution back-facing camera and a bigger sensor.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has just a bit more memory for games and applications than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC counts with greater battery performance than Honor View30 Pro, because it has a 26% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.