Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2019-11-26 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is slightly better than Honor View30 Pro, getting a score of 81.1 against 74.6. Both of these devices include the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding OS features. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a a little heavier cellphone than Honor View30 Pro, but both of them are equally thin.
The Honor View30 Pro has a little bit better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Honor View30 Pro also counts with a bit greater amount of pixels per inch in the screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Honor View30 Pro features a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Honor View30 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a little bit better camera than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for low light captures, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a larger camera sensor which gives a better photo and video quality and a much higher resolution camera in the back.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features improved battery performance than Honor View30 Pro, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.