Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-11-26 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a general score of 79, which is a bit better than the Honor View30 Pro's score of 74.6. These phones have Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has a newer 11 version while Honor View30 Pro has Android 10 version, so it provides some nice extra features and performance tweaks. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S is a just a little heavier cellphone than Honor View30 Pro, but both are 0.35inches thick.
The Honor View30 Pro counts with a slightly better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Honor View30 Pro also counts with a little bit greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Honor View30 Pro features a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Honor View30 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has improved battery performance than Honor View30 Pro, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Honor View30 Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same video frame rate and the same back camera sensor size, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S also counts with a higher 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.