Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2019-11-26 | 2021-06-04 |
| 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Galaxy black, Icelandic frost, Ocean blue and Sunrise orange | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| HiSilicon Kirin 990 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP16 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 35.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a global score of 78.1, which is a bit better than Honor View30 Pro's general score of 74.6. These phones work with Android operating system, but the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a more recent 11 version and Honor View30 Pro has Android 10, so it gives you a couple additional features and better performance. The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra is a newer cellphone, and it is also somewhat thinner and just a little bit lighter than Honor View30 Pro.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features a screen that is just as good as the screen in Honor View30 Pro, because although the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a little inferior number of pixels per inch in the display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a bit bigger screen.
Honor View30 Pro and ZTE Axon 30 Ultra have very similar CPUs, they have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores. The Honor View30 Pro and the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra both count with extremely similar storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory.
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a little better battery duration than Honor View30 Pro, because it has a 12% greater battery size. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Honor View30 Pro, and although they both have a F1.6 aperture, the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra also has a much better video resolution and a back camera with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.