![]() |
|
Global Score | |
36.4 | 39.7 |
Basic Information | |
HP | Samsung |
Windows Mobile Professional 6.0 | -- |
2007-09-05 | 2011-03-08 |
4.45 x 2.52 x 0.63 inches | 4.33 x 2.39 x 0.46 inches |
5.15 ounces | 3.60 ounces |
-- | Pink, White and Yellow |
$ 399.00 | $ 79.00 |
Display / Screen | |
2.5 inches | 3.1 inches |
320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
TFT | TFT |
160 pixels per inch | 129 pixels per inch |
Resistive | Capacitive |
6 | 5.4 |
Marvell PXA270 (Single-Core 520 MHz) processor | processor |
128 MB RAM | -- |
GPU | GPU |
6.66 | 5.76 |
Storage | |
-- | 26,62 MB internal memory |
microSD external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot |
0 | 1.3 |
Camera | |
3.00 MP | 2.00 MP |
220 x 176 video resolution | 320 x 240 (30 fps) (QVGA) video resolution |
5.06 | 5.17 |
Networks | |
Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | EDGE and GSM |
SIM | SIM |
3.3 | 2.7 |
Battery Life | |
1840mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
250 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | 620 hours standby time 9.5 hours talk time |
3.68 | 2.56 |
Other Features | |
Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 3.0 |
GPS | -- |
Samsung Corby II has a score of 39.7, which is a little bit better than the HP iPAQ 900's score of 36.4. Samsung Corby II's body is notably newer, notably lighter and notably thinner than HP iPAQ 900. HP iPAQ 900 has a brighter screen than Samsung Corby II, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 240 x 320px resolution, the HP iPAQ 900 also counts with a bit greater pixels density.
The HP iPAQ 900 has a superior CPU than Samsung Corby II, because it has more cpu cores. Samsung Corby II counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than HP iPAQ 900. Samsung Corby II counts with a slightly better camera than HP iPAQ 900, because although it has a way worse 2 mega-pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a lot better video resolution.
The HP iPAQ 900 has a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Corby II, because it has an 84% larger battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, Samsung Corby II is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.