Compare phones
HP iPAQ 900
900, 910Samsung Primo
S5610, S5610K
|
|
| Global Score | |
| 36.4 | 40 |
| Basic Information | |
| HP | Samsung |
| Windows Mobile Professional 6.0 | -- |
| 2007-09-05 | 0000-00-00 |
| 4.45 x 2.52 x 0.63 inches | 4.68 x 1.96 x 0.50 inches |
| 5.15 ounces | 3.21 ounces |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 399.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.5 inches | 2.4 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | -- |
| 160 pixels per inch | 167 pixels per inch |
| Resistive | No touch screen |
| 6 | 6 |
| Marvell PXA270 (Single-Core 520 MHz) processor | processor |
| 128 MB RAM | -- |
| GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU |
| 6.66 | 5.94 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 112,64 MB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 1.6 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 5.00 MP |
| 220 x 176 video resolution | 320 x 240 (30 fps) (QVGA) video resolution |
| 5.06 | 5.94 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 3.3 | 1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1840mAh Li-Ion Battery | -- |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | 960 hours standby time 15.2 hours talk time |
| 3.68 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 3.0 |
| GPS | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Primo is a bit better than the HP iPAQ 900, getting a global score of 40 against 36.4. The Samsung Primo construction is way thinner and much lighter than HP iPAQ 900. The HP iPAQ 900 and the Samsung Primo have incredibly similar displays, because although the Samsung Primo has a little smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 320 x 240, it also counts with a little bit better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Primo has a much bigger memory to store more apps and games than HP iPAQ 900. The HP iPAQ 900 counts with a more powerful processor than Samsung Primo, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and faster). Samsung Primo has a better camera than HP iPAQ 900, because it has a back-facing camera with way more MP and a lot better 320x240 video definition.
HP iPAQ 900 counts with a much longer battery duration than Samsung Primo.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Samsung Primo is also a lot cheaper, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.