Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 34.3 | 64.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HP | Nokia |
| Windows Mobile Standard 6.1 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-06-10 |
| 4.49 x 1.97 x 0.54 inches | 6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches |
| 3.77 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 91.00 | $ 90.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 167 pixels per inch | 293 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 128 MB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 504 GPU |
| 5.76 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 5.06 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1260mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 2990mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 270 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 3.1 A is a lot better than the HP iPAQ Voice Messenger, with a 64.8 score against 34.3. Nokia 3.1 A has Android 9.0 Pie OS, while HP iPAQ Voice Messenger counts with Windows Mobile Standard 6.1 OS. The Nokia 3.1 A is a noticeably heavier but way thinner phone than HP iPAQ Voice Messenger.
The Nokia 3.1 A has an incredibly better display than HP iPAQ Voice Messenger, because it has a lot larger screen, a way better 720 x 1440 resolution and a much better display density. The Nokia 3.1 A features a very superior hardware performance than HP iPAQ Voice Messenger, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of cores (and faster).
The Nokia 3.1 A takes greater pictures and videos than HP iPAQ Voice Messenger, because it has a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels. The Nokia 3.1 A has much more storage capacity for games and applications than HP iPAQ Voice Messenger. The Nokia 3.1 A features a much longer battery performance than HP iPAQ Voice Messenger, because it has 2990mAh of battery capacity.
Nokia 3.1 A is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the HP iPAQ Voice Messenger.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.