Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 49.3 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HP | Samsung |
| Android 4.2.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| -- | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green, Pink, Purple and White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 165.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 245 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Marvell PXA1088 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (1333 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.05 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 2.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S9 is much better than the HP Slate 6 VoiceTab, having a overall score of 83.3 against 49.3. The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a way better display than HP Slate 6 VoiceTab, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher pixel density and a way higher 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S9 features a superior storage capacity for applications and games than HP Slate 6 VoiceTab, because it has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 400 GB and 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S9 has a more powerful processor than HP Slate 6 VoiceTab, because it has a greater number of cores and 3 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy S9 has a greater camera than HP Slate 6 VoiceTab, because it has a back camera with a way better 12 megapixels resolution. Galaxy S9's battery performance is very similar to the HP Slate 6 VoiceTab one.
The Galaxy S9 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the HP Slate 6 VoiceTab, which makes it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.