Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2016-05-04 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 Pro Max is better than the HTC 10, with a general score of 85.3 against 75.7. The iPhone 11 Pro Max is a much newer and just a bit thinner cellphone than the HTC 10, although it's also a lot heavier. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max features a faster processing unit than HTC 10, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max also has a greater number of cores and a 64 bits processor.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has a bit sharper screen than HTC 10, because although it has a bit lower screen pixels density and a little lower 1242 x 2688 resolution, it also counts with a bigger display. HTC 10 features a little bit better camera than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same resolution camera in the back and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the HTC 10 also has a bigger sensor taking better quality photos and videos and better 120 frames per second video frame rate.
HTC 10 counts with a lot bigger memory for applications and games than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. IPhone 11 Pro Max has superior battery duration than HTC 10, because it has a 3969mAh battery capacity.
Although iPhone 11 Pro Max is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the HTC 10, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as HTC 10. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the HTC 10, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.