Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Apple |
| 2016-05-04 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is better than HTC 10, having a general score of 88.1 against 75.7. The Apple iPhone X is a newer and thinner device than the HTC 10, although it is also a bit heavier. The Apple iPhone X has a little sharper display than HTC 10, because although it has a just a little worse display pixels density and a bit lower 1125 x 2436 resolution, it also counts with a little bit larger screen.
The Apple iPhone X counts with slightly more memory for games and applications than HTC 10, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Apple iPhone X has a superior processing power than HTC 10, because although it has 1 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU and a greater number of cores.
HTC 10 has a bit superior battery life than Apple iPhone X, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity. HTC 10 counts with a little bit better camera than Apple iPhone X, and although they both have the same aperture, the same resolution camera in the back and the same (4K) video quality, the HTC 10 also has faster video frame rates and a way bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it is way more expensive than HTC 10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the HTC 10. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the iPhone X, else you can save a couple dollars and get the HTC 10, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.