Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Apple |
| 2016-05-04 | 2018-09-21 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS has a general score of 84.2, which is much better than the HTC 10's 75.7 score. The iPhone XS design is notably newer and somewhat thinner, but just a bit heavier than the HTC 10. The iPhone XS features a little more vivid screen than HTC 10, because although it has a just a little worse screen density and a little lower 1125 x 2436 resolution, it also counts with a little larger display.
Apple iPhone XS features a superior processing unit than HTC 10, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone XS also has 2 more cpu cores and a 64 bits processing unit. The HTC 10 counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
HTC 10 takes a little bit better videos and photos than Apple iPhone XS, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same (4K) video quality and a same resolution camera in the back, the HTC 10 also has a bigger sensor capturing better quality pictures and better video frame rates. HTC 10 features a bit superior battery life than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity.
Although iPhone XS is a better device, it is way more expensive than HTC 10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as HTC 10. If you want to save some money, you can buy HTC 10, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.