Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| 2016-05-04 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is a bit better than the HTC 10, having an 80 score against 75.7. The Google Pixel 3 is a a lot newer phone, and it is also somewhat thinner and just a little bit lighter than HTC 10. The HTC 10 counts with a slightly better display than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel number in each inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
HTC 10 has a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit superior CPU than HTC 10, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Google Pixel 3 also has a greater number of cores (and faster).
The HTC 10 takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a worse resolution back facing camera, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the HTC 10 also counts with a larger sensor which offers a better image and video quality.
HTC 10 has just a bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 3000mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, the Google Pixel 3 is also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.