Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-05-04 | 2020-11-19 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is better than the HTC 10, with an 87.5 score against 75.7. The Google Pixel 4a 5G body is notably newer and a little thinner, but also a little heavier than HTC 10. HTC 10 has a little bit better looking display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel number in each display inch and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a little bit better hardware performance than HTC 10, because it has more cpu cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. HTC 10 features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features improved battery lifetime than HTC 10, because it has 3885mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. HTC 10 captures clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a lower video resolution, a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low-light photos and video and a worse resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a larger sensor shooting higher quality videos and photographs.
Google Pixel 4a 5G is a lot more expensive than HTC 10, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.