Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2016-05-04 | 2015-10-01 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Aluminum | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| S-LCD 5 | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.45 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.1 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V10 is a little bit better than the HTC 10, with a global score of 78.6 against 75.7. The LG V10 construction is a bit thinner but somewhat heavier than HTC 10, and both were released only 7 months apart. LG V10 has a bit better looking screen than HTC 10, because although it has a little bit lower screen density, and they both have the same exact 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution, the LG V10 also counts with a quite larger display.
The LG V10 counts with more storage capacity to install games and applications than HTC 10, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB, the LG V10 also has 64 GB internal memory capacity. HTC 10 features a little better hardware performance than LG V10, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the HTC 10 also has 3 more cpu cores.
LG V10's battery performance is very similar to HTC 10's battery lifetime. The LG V10 shoots clearer photographs and videos than HTC 10, because although it has a tinier sensor taking lower quality videos and photos, and they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a same size aperture, the LG V10 also counts with a lot higher 16 MP resolution camera.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, LG V10 is also the cheapest, which makes it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.