Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2016-05-04 | 2018-03-09 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ has a global score of 82.5, which is a bit better than the HTC 10's 75.7 score. The LG V30S ThinQ construction is newer, somewhat thinner and just a little lighter than HTC 10. HTC 10 counts with a little sharper display than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1440 x 2560, it also counts with a just a bit better pixel number in each display inch.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with just a bit better hardware performance than HTC 10, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores. LG V30S ThinQ features a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than HTC 10, and although they both have a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The HTC 10 captures clearer pictures and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing images and video in poorly lited situations and a much lower 12 megapixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor.
LG V30S ThinQ features just a bit better battery duration than HTC 10, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more than the HTC 10, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as HTC 10. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the LG V30S ThinQ, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the HTC 10, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.