Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-05-04 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola edge has a score of 89.6, which is much better than HTC 10's 75.7 global score. The Motorola edge design is noticeably newer than HTC 10's, but it's somewhat heavier and a little thicker. The HTC 10 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola edge, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater pixel count per screen inch.
The Motorola edge has a bit faster processing unit than HTC 10, because it has 4 more CPU cores and more RAM. The Motorola edge has a superior camera than HTC 10, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola edge also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photographs and a back camera with way more MP.
Motorola edge has a much bigger memory for games and applications than HTC 10, because although it has an external memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola edge counts with a much longer battery performance than HTC 10, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Motorola edge is way more expensive than the HTC 10, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.