Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-05-04 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.45 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an overall score of 87.1, which is much better than HTC 10's 75.7 global score. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a way newer and just a little bit thinner device than HTC 10, although it's also heavier. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a slightly better screen than HTC 10, because although it has a lot lesser pixels per display inch and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a bigger display.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC 10, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. HTC 10 counts with a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM and less cpu cores (although they are faster).
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a way better battery duration than HTC 10, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes much better photos and videos than HTC 10, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a larger aperture to take better low light photos and videos and a camera with a way better 50 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.