Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| 2016-05-04 | 2019-09-05 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom is a little bit better than the HTC 10, getting an 80 score against 75.7. Motorola One Zoom is a somewhat heavier cellphone than HTC 10, but they have the same thickness. Motorola One Zoom counts with a little bit better processing power than HTC 10, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Motorola One Zoom also has more cores (although slower).
HTC 10 counts with a little bit better screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. The Motorola One Zoom counts with a superior camera than HTC 10, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola One Zoom also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better low light photography and videos, a much more megapixels back camera and a larger camera sensor capturing better quality videos and photos.
The HTC 10 counts with just a bit bigger storage for apps and games than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola One Zoom has greater battery duration than HTC 10, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it is way more expensive than the HTC 10, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the HTC 10. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy HTC 10, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.