Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Nokia |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-05-04 | 2020-11-12 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Meteor grey |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a global score of 80.3, which is just a bit better than the HTC 10's global score of 75.7. Nokia 8 V 5G UW's design has the same thickness than the HTC 10, but it is heavier. HTC 10 features a bit sharper screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a slightly bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC 10, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity. Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a bit better processing power than HTC 10, because it has 2 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a much longer battery performance than HTC 10, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. Nokia 8 V 5G UW shoots much clearer videos and photos than HTC 10, because although it has lower 60 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a same size diafragm aperture, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also counts with a way larger back camera sensor capturing way better quality photos and videos and a back-facing camera with much more megapixels.
Although Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better device, it costs a lot more than HTC 10, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the HTC 10. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Nokia 8 V 5G UW, else you can save some money and get the HTC 10, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.