Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-05-04 | 2020-09-02 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 5S is slightly better than the HTC 10, with a global score of 76.2 against 75.7. Even though the nubia Red Magic 5S is much newer than HTC 10, it is a little bit thicker and extremely heavier. HTC 10 counts with a bit sharper screen than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a greater screen density.
The HTC 10 counts with a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. Nubia Red Magic 5S features a little better processing power than HTC 10, because it has more cores and more RAM memory.
Nubia Red Magic 5S captures much better photographs and videos than HTC 10, and although they both have a same size aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a back facing camera with way more mega pixels, a much larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a really longer battery life than HTC 10, because it has a 50% more battery size.
Although nubia Red Magic 5S is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than HTC 10, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as HTC 10. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy nubia Red Magic 5S, but if you don't you can save some money and get the HTC 10, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.