Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-05-04 | 2019-12-27 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is much better than HTC 10, having a overall score of 85.5 against 75.7. Although the Galaxy A51 is a little heavier than the HTC 10, it's somewhat thinner and extremely newer. The HTC 10 has just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels count per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Galaxy A51 counts with a bit faster processor than HTC 10, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Galaxy A51 also has 4 more CPU cores. Galaxy A51 has a superior camera than HTC 10, because although it has slower video frame rates and a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a bigger sensor taking better quality pictures and videos and a lot higher 48 MP resolution camera.
The Galaxy A51 features more storage to install games and applications than HTC 10, because although it has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. Galaxy A51 counts with better battery performance than HTC 10, because it has a 33% greater battery size.
Galaxy A51 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.