Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-05-04 | 2020-04-29 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a global score of 90.8, which is much better than the HTC 10's 75.7 general score. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's construction is noticeably newer and just a bit thinner, but also heavier than the HTC 10. HTC 10 has a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen pixels density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Galaxy A51 5G has a bit better CPU than HTC 10, because it has more RAM memory and 4 more cpu cores. The Galaxy A51 5G shoots much clearer photos and videos than HTC 10, because although it has lower video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A51 5G also counts with a larger back camera sensor and a camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The Galaxy A51 5G features a very superior memory to store more games and applications than HTC 10, because although it has an external memory card slot that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. Galaxy A51 5G has a much better battery performance than HTC 10, because it has a 50 percent larger battery size.
Galaxy A51 5G costs a little more than HTC 10, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.