Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2016-05-04 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is way better than the HTC 10, with a general score of 91.3 against 75.7. Although the Galaxy A52 5G is somewhat heavier than the HTC 10, it's a little bit thinner and newer. The HTC 10 counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than HTC 10, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports 976 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than HTC 10, because it has a larger amount of RAM and 4 more 2200 MHz CPU cores.
Galaxy A52 5G features a better camera than HTC 10, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same camera aperture, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way better image and video quality and a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a way better battery duration than HTC 10, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.