Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-05-04 | 2021-09-01 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is way better than the HTC 10, having a general score of 91.1 against 75.7. The Samsung Galaxy A52s body is noticeably newer and just a little thinner, but also somewhat heavier than HTC 10. The HTC 10 has a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Galaxy A52s features a bit more powerful processor than HTC 10, because it has 4 more processing cores and a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a superior camera than HTC 10, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also counts with a way bigger sensor and a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
The Galaxy A52s has a much better memory to install applications and games than HTC 10, because although it has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy A52s features a much longer battery life than HTC 10, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.