Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-05-04 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 is a little bit better than HTC 10, having a global score of 76.9 against 75.7. The Galaxy A70 is a extremely newer and somewhat thinner phone than HTC 10, but it is also somewhat heavier. HTC 10 has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a greater display density and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A70 has a bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than HTC 10, because although it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory. Galaxy A70 counts with just a little better processing power than HTC 10, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
HTC 10 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video definition, the HTC 10 also counts with a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and better 120 frames per second video frame rate.
The Galaxy A70 has a much better battery lifetime than HTC 10, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, Galaxy A70 is also cheap compared to the other phone, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.