Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-05-04 | 2020-07-16 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than the HTC 10, having a global score of 92.9 against 75.7. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a noticeably newer and just a bit thinner phone than HTC 10, but it is heavier. The HTC 10 features just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little better hardware performance than HTC 10, because it has a higher amount of RAM and more CPU cores. Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a better camera than HTC 10, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and photos and a camera in the back with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution.
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC 10, because although it has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a very superior battery performance than HTC 10, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Galaxy A71 5G UW is way more expensive than HTC 10, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.