Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-05-04 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.45 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a general score of 88.1, which is better than HTC 10's score of 75.7. Samsung Galaxy F62's construction is noticeably newer than HTC 10's, although it's a little thicker and way heavier. Galaxy F62 counts with a little faster CPU than HTC 10, and although they both have a Quad-Core processor, the Galaxy F62 also has more RAM memory.
HTC 10 counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy F62, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution. Samsung Galaxy F62 features a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC 10, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy F62 takes much better photos and videos than HTC 10, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution and a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a much bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality and a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a way better battery duration than HTC 10, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.