Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-05-04 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 300.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is much better than the HTC 10, getting a overall score of 97.6 against 75.7. Galaxy Fold is a much newer and incredibly thinner phone than HTC 10, but it is extremely heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with just a little better processing power than HTC 10, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores.
The HTC 10 features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a lot greater screen pixel density and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Samsung Galaxy Fold features much more memory for games and applications than HTC 10, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
HTC 10 features a little bit better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for taking images and video in low-light environments, and they both have a 12 mega pixels camera in the back and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the HTC 10 also counts with a larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and higher 120 fps video frame rates.
Galaxy Fold has a much better battery duration than HTC 10, because it has a 46% larger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more than HTC 10, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the HTC 10. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the HTC 10, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.