Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| 2016-05-04 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 has a general score of 90.8, which is much better than the HTC 10's 75.7 global score. Galaxy Note 20's design is extremely newer and a little thinner than HTC 10's, but it is also somewhat heavier. The Galaxy Note 20 has a bit better processing power than HTC 10, because it has 4 GB more RAM and 4 more CPU cores.
The HTC 10 has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher number of pixels per inch of screen. Galaxy Note 20 counts with a slightly better camera than HTC 10, and although they both have a same size aperture and a 12 mega pixels camera in the back, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality and a way higher video definition.
The HTC 10 features a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy Note 20 counts with a really longer battery life than HTC 10, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than HTC 10, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the HTC 10. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get the HTC 10, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.