Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-05-04 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than the HTC 10, having a 98.9 score against 75.7. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra construction is newer and just a little thinner, but noticeably heavier than the HTC 10. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit superior processor than HTC 10, because it has 8 GB more RAM and a higher number of cores.
The HTC 10 counts with a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a little lower 1440 x 2560 resolution and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels quantity per inch of screen. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than HTC 10, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes way better photographs and videos than HTC 10, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much higher video definition, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way higher photo and video quality and a back camera with a much higher resolution.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much longer battery lifetime than HTC 10, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs a lot more money than the HTC 10, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.