Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-05-04 | 2020-01-21 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a score of 86.2, which is better than HTC 10's general score of 75.7. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite body is noticeably newer and just a little bit thinner, but also heavier than the HTC 10. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features a bit better CPU than HTC 10, because it has 4 more cpu cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
HTC 10 features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and a greater pixels quantity per inch in the display. Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than HTC 10, because although it has an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The HTC 10 counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs in poorly lited environments, and they both have a camera in the back with a 12 MP and the same (4K) video quality, the HTC 10 also counts with better video frame rates and a larger camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Galaxy Note10 Lite features a superior battery lifetime than HTC 10, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.