Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-05-04 | 2019-05-16 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G is way better than the HTC 10, having a general score of 93.6 against 75.7. The Galaxy S10 5G construction is a lot newer and thinner, but somewhat heavier than the HTC 10. Galaxy S10 5G has a little bit better processing power than HTC 10, because it has 4 GB more RAM and more cpu cores.
The HTC 10 counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a much smaller screen and a bit worse 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit better screen density. The HTC 10 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same resolution back camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the HTC 10 also counts with higher video frame rates and a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a bit bigger storage capacity for applications and games than HTC 10, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a very superior battery performance than HTC 10, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S10 5G costs a little more than the HTC 10, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.