Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-05-04 | -- |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 5.68 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than HTC 10, with a 90.7 score against 75.7. The Galaxy S25 Ultra body is much lighter and thinner than the HTC 10. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a better screen than HTC 10, because although it has a bit inferior count of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution and a lot larger screen.
HTC 10 counts with a much greater processing power than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has lesser processing cores and less RAM. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a greater camera than HTC 10, because it has a lot better video definition, a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a larger camera aperture for better images and videos in poorly lited situations and a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has slightly more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC 10, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much longer battery life than HTC 10, because it has a 67 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.