Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-05-04 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 300.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is better than HTC 10's 75.7 score. Galaxy Z Flip's design is a lot newer and somewhat thinner, but also heavier than the HTC 10. The HTC 10 features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher screen pixels density.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a little better hardware performance than HTC 10, because it has a greater number of cores (and also faster) and a larger amount of RAM. The HTC 10 counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same video definition, a F1.8 aperture and a same resolution back facing camera, the HTC 10 also has faster 120 frames per second video frame rates and a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality videos and pictures.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit more memory to store more apps and games than HTC 10, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better battery duration than HTC 10, because it has a 10 percent more battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more than HTC 10, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as HTC 10. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the HTC 10, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.