Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-05-04 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 300.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has an overall score of 94.6, which is a lot better than the HTC 10's 75.7 global score. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 is heavier than HTC 10, it's noticeably thinner and noticeably newer. The HTC 10 features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a much smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1440 x 2560px, it also counts with a way better quantity of pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a bit bigger storage to install applications and games than HTC 10, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a little better performance than HTC 10, because it has a greater number of faster cores and 8 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 and HTC 10 count with extremely similar cameras, because although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, a F1.8 aperture and a same resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a way bigger sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than HTC 10, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than HTC 10, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the HTC 10. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, else you can save some dollars and buy the HTC 10, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.