Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-05-04 | 2020-02-11 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X2 is a little bit better than the HTC 10, with a global score of 79.3 against 75.7. The Xiaomi Poco X2 design has the same thickness than the HTC 10, but it is heavier. The Xiaomi Poco X2 features a little better hardware performance than HTC 10, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
HTC 10 has a bit better screen than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Xiaomi Poco X2 has a superior camera than HTC 10, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also counts with a way more mega-pixels camera and a much bigger camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality.
The HTC 10 features a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Poco X2 counts with a really longer battery duration than HTC 10, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.