Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-05-04 | 2020-09-08 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is a bit better than HTC 10, getting an 81.6 score against 75.7. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's design is notably newer than HTC 10's, although it is heavier and just a little thicker. The HTC 10 counts with a little bit better looking display than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel quantity in each inch of screen and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a bit superior CPU than HTC 10, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and they are faster). Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC shoots much clearer pictures and videos than HTC 10, because although it has lower video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot better 64 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
The HTC 10 counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a much better battery lifetime than HTC 10, because it has a 72% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.