Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-05-04 | 2021-03-24 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Aluminum | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is a bit better than HTC 10, having an 82.4 score against 75.7. Even though Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is somewhat heavier than the HTC 10, it's just a little bit thinner and noticeably newer. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a little sharper display than HTC 10, because although it has a way lower screen pixel density and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a larger display.
HTC 10 features a slightly better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a little faster CPU than HTC 10, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a larger number of cores (and also faster).
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a very superior battery duration than HTC 10, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro takes better videos and photos than HTC 10, because although it has a tinier aperture and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also counts with a lot more megapixels back-facing camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.