Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-05-04 | 2020-05-20 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is just a bit better than HTC 10, with a 76.6 score against 75.7. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is a heavier device than the HTC 10, but both have the same thickness. HTC 10 has a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher display pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The HTC 10 counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 features just a bit better processing power than HTC 10, because although it has lesser RAM, it also counts with more cores (but slower).
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a little bit better camera than HTC 10, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality and a F1.8 aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 also counts with a camera in the back with a much better resolution and a larger camera sensor.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a very superior battery lifetime than HTC 10, because it has a 67 percent more battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheaper than the HTC 10.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.