Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-05-04 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a global score of 81.1, which is a bit better than the HTC 10's 75.7 global score. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a way heavier cellphone than the HTC 10, but both of them are 0.35inches thick. The HTC 10 features a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560px resolution and a greater display pixels density.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a bit more powerful CPU than HTC 10, because it has a larger number of cores and more RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a better camera than HTC 10, because although it has a tinier aperture and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher resolution and a lot larger camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photographs.
HTC 10 features slightly more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much longer battery life than HTC 10, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is also cheaper than the other phone, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.