Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 61.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Windows Phone 8 | -- |
| 2013-06-26 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.20 x 2.60 x 0.39 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 217 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8930 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 200 (Dual-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (533 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.06 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.60 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is way better than the HTC 8XT, with a general score of 81.3 against 61.4. LG V35 ThinQ's body is incredibly newer and extremely thinner than HTC 8XT's, but it's heavier. The LG V35 ThinQ features a better performing CPU than HTC 8XT, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores and 5 GB more RAM memory.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a sharper screen than HTC 8XT, because it has a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2880, a way bigger display and a way better screen density. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than HTC 8XT, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 56 GB more internal storage capacity.
LG V35 ThinQ features a very superior camera than HTC 8XT, because it has a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels, a much higher 3840x2160 video quality and a larger camera aperture for better low-light images and video. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a superior battery duration than HTC 8XT, because it has an 83 percent bigger battery size.
LG V35 ThinQ is a little more expensive than HTC 8XT, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.